The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte CHUAN-BAO WANG, P. RICHARD WARBURTON AND BETH TOMASOVIC ____________ Appeal 2007-0300 Application 10/101,960 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: August 16, 2007 ____________ Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1, 4, 6, 8-38, 40, and 43-52. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6. Appellants claim a method for forming a sensing or compensating bead for a gas sensor which comprises depositing by CVD layers ofPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013