The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte DAVID P. PARKS and JACKSON W. WEGELIN __________ Appeal 2007-0305 Application 10/067,186 Technology Center 1700 __________ DECIDED: September 13, 2007 __________ Before TONI R. SCHEINER, DEMETRA J. MILLS, and LORA M. GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges. SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1-3, 5-11, 13, 14, 16-45, 48, and 51-64.1 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm. 1 Claims 4, 12, 15, 46, 47, 49, and 50 are also pending, but not the subject of appeal. The Examiner has not addressed the status of these claims in the Answer.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013