The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte CRAIG STEPHEN SLAVTCHEFF,
JESSICA WEISS GOLDBERG, ANAT SHILOACH,
MICHAEL MASSARO, and CHRISTINE ELIZABETH KENNEDY
__________
Appeal 2007-0321
Application 10/669,547
Technology Center 1600
__________
Decided: September 6, 2007
__________
Before TONI R. SCHEINER, ERIC GRIMES, and RICHARD M.
LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to a method
of removing hair. The Examiner has rejected the claims as obvious. We
have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
“Depilatories are cosmetic compositions[s] which remove hair
through chemical reaction . . . . Commercially the most common agents are
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013