The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID JOHN TYRRELL, CHANTEL SPRING BUHROW,
BETH ANNE LANGE, DUANE GERALD KRZYSIK,
EARL DAVID BROCK, JAMES LOUIS CAHALL,
SAMUEL QCHENG LIN, RONNI LYNN WEINKAUF,
and UMA SANTHANAN
____________
Appeal 2007-0326
Application 09/746,888
Technology Center 3700
____________
Decided: May 2, 2007
____________
Before CHUNG K. PAK, TERRY J. OWENS, and THOMAS A. WALTZ,
Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-7, 10-34, 37-41, 43, 45-47,
and 49-57. The remaining claims in this application are claims 8, 9, 35, 36,
42, 44, and 48, which stand withdrawn from consideration by the Examiner
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013