Ex Parte Farahat et al - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                  
                                          precedent of the Board.                                            

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                         Ex parte AYMAN O. FARAHAT, FRANCINE R. CHEN,                                        
                         CHARLES R. MATHIS and GEOFFREY D. NUNBERG                                           
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-0342                                                
                                          Application 10/232,932                                             
                                          Technology Center 2100                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                          Decided: July 23, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                  

                Before JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, and                                        
                ALLEN R. MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.                                            

                BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                    


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This appeal involves claims 1-9, the only claims pending in this                       
                application.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b), 134(a).                          







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013