Ex Parte Burnhouse et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                          Ex parte TARA BURNHOUSE, YUKO NISHIKAWA,                                           
                                          and DAYAN GOLDEN                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-0345                                                
                                          Application 09/812,417                                             
                                          Technology Center 2100                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                           Decided: May 2, 2007                                              
                                               ____________                                                  

                Before JOSEPH L. DIXON, ALLEN R. MACDONALD, and JOHN A.                                      
                JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                       
                JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s                            
                rejection of claims 1-28.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                      








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013