1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
2 not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4
5 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
6 _____________
7
8 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
9 AND INTERFERENCES
10 _____________
11
12 Ex parte GUENTHER SCHMIDT and GERDA SCHMIDT
13 _____________
14
15 Appeal No. 2007-0359
16 Application No. 10/485,356
17 Technology Center 3600
18 ______________
19
20 Decided: June 15, 2007
21 _______________
22
22 Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, TERRY J. OWENS, and MURRIEL E.
23
23 CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
24
25
25 OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
26
27
28
29 DECISION ON APPEAL
30 The Appellants appeal from a rejection of claims 10-12 and 16-18, which are
31 all of the pending claims.
32 THE INVENTION
33 The Appellants claim a method for degassing a vehicle hydraulic brake
34 system, and a master cylinder for use in that method. Claims 10 and 18 are
35 illustrative:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013