Ex Parte Ruse et al - Page 1



                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered                              
                                today is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                   
                           Ex parte ANDY L. RUSE and BLAKE A. SWEETEN                                         
                                               ____________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-0374                                                 
                                           Application 09/891,167                                             
                                             Technology Center                                                
                                               ____________                                                   
                                         Decided: August, 10 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                   

                Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, LANCE LEONARD BARRY, and,                                         
                JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                 
                BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           


                                      I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                
                      A Patent Examiner rejected claims 1-18.  The Appellants appeal                          
                therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a).  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.                     
                § 6(b).                                                                                       








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013