The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SHAO-HUA GUO, WEI WANG,
and DANIEL B. POURREAU
____________
Appeal 2007-0381
Application 09/934,878
Technology Center 1600
____________
Decided: April 30, 2007
____________
Before CHARLES F. WARREN, PETER F. KRATZ, and
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
ORDER REMANDING TO THE EXAMINER
We remand the application to the jurisdiction of the Examiner and
involved Technology Center for consideration of the Response to
Supplemental Answer filed February 17, 2006. 37 C.F.R. §§ 41.35(b) and
41.50(a)(1) (2006).
A review of this Response (Reply) reveals that although the Board of
Patent Appeals & Interferences (Board) is referred to in the remarks, the
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013