Ex Parte 6766598 et al - Page 14

             Appeal No. 2007-0382                                                                                   
             Reexamination 90/007,172                                                                               
             disclosed for “substitute upper components [i.e., straps].”  (Col. 5, lines 4-12.)                     
             These “substitute upper components” are said to include man-made imitation                             
             leathers such as polyurethane or polyvinylchloride (PVC).  (Col. 4, lines 6-12.)                       
             Cole does not expressly state how the PVC covering is fastened to insole 12.  (Fig.                    
             1.)                                                                                                    
                    The Patent Owner does not dispute the Examiner’s factual finding that Cole                      
             describes an “insole 12 having a flexible inner compressible structure...having a                      
             top surface, a bottom surface and a side surface extending around the outer                            
             perimeter of the inner structure between the top and bottom surfaces...”                               
             (Examiner’s Answer at page 3.)  Likewise, the patent owner does not contend that                       
             Cole’s description of the PVC covering over the insole 12 lacks sufficient                             
             specificity.  Nor does the Patent Owner dispute the Examiner’s factual findings                        
             that (1) PVC would inherently form a water barrier and (2) Cole describes a PVC                        
             covering that “substantially covers the entire top, bottom and side surfaces of the                    
             compressible structure.”  (Examiner’s Answer at page 3.)                                               
                    Rather, the Patent Owner focuses on only one claim limitation to assert that                    
             Cole does not anticipate appealed claim 1.2  Specifically, the Patent Owner                            

                                                                                                                   
                    2  At oral argument, counsel for the Patent Owner confirmed that the only                       
             question raised in the briefs with respect to appealed claim 1 is whether fastening                    
             or stitching the PVC covering in Cole would preclude the covering from being a                         
             “continuous layer.”                                                                                    
                                                        14                                                          

Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013