1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
2 not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4
5 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
6 _____________
7
8 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
9 AND INTERFERENCES
10 _____________
11
12 Ex parte RICHARD L. FISHER
13 _____________
14
15 Appeal No. 2007-0387
16 Application No. 09/756,688
17 Technology Center 3600
18 ______________
19
20 Decided: May 31, 2007
21 _______________
22
22 Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, TERRY J. OWENS, and STUART S. LEVY,
23
23 Administrative Patent Judges.
24
25
25 PATE, III, Administrative Patent Judge.
26
27
28
29 DECISION ON APPEAL
30 STATEMENT OF THE CASE
31
32
33 This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 40-42, 44-46, 48, 49, 51,
34 and 52. Claims 21, 23, 25, 26, 28-31, 39, 73, and 74 stand allowed. Claims 43, 47,
35 and 50 stand objected to. These are all the claims in the application. We have
36 jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013