Ex Parte Semersky - Page 2

                 Appeal 2007-0404                                                                                       
                 Application 10/684,611                                                                                 

                 as a foam with foam cells containing carbon dioxide (Br. 2).  Independent                              
                 claim 1 is representative of the invention and is reproduced below:                                    
                        1. A container, comprising:                                                                     
                        a first layer of plastic; and                                                                   
                        a second layer of plastic contacting said first layer, said second layer                        
                 of plastic formed as a foam wherein the form cells contain carbon dioxide.                             

                        The Examiner has relied on the following references as evidence of                              
                 unpatentability:                                                                                       
                 Haase                                        US 3,684,633                          Aug. 15, 1972       
                 Park                                          US 5,149,579                          Sep. 22, 1992      
                 Kocher                                      US 5,919,547                          Jul. 06, 1999        
                 Hayes                                        US 6,485,819 B2                    Nov. 26, 2002          
                                               ISSUES ON APPEAL                                                         
                        Claims 1, 2, 5, 8-13, 16-19, and 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                              
                 § 102(b) as anticipated by Park (Answer 3).  Claims 1-11, 22, and 23 stand                             
                 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by Hayes (id.).                                       
                        Claims 3, 4, 6, 7, 14, 15, 20, 21, and 23-25 stand rejected under                               
                 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Park in view of Hayes (Answer 4).                              
                 Claims 12-17 and 24 stand rejected under § 103(a) over Hayes in view of                                
                 Park (Answer 5).  Claims 18-21, and 25 stand rejected under § 103(a) as                                
                 unpatentable over Hayes in view of Haase (Answer 6).  Claims 1-11, 22, and                             
                 23 stand rejected under § 103(a) as unpatentable over Kocher in view of                                
                 Hayes (Answer 7).1                                                                                     
                                                                                                                       
                 1 The rejection of claims 8 and 9 under the second paragraph of 35 U.S.C.                              
                 § 112 has been withdrawn by the Examiner (Answer 2-3).                                                 
                                                           2                                                            

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013