Ex Parte Lingle - Page 1



                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                           
                            for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     
                                                   ____________                                                         
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                   ____________                                                         
                                            Ex parte PHILIP J. LINGLE                                                   
                                                   ____________                                                         
                                                 Appeal 2007-0408                                                       
                                              Application 10/150,014                                                    
                                              Technology Center 1700                                                    
                                                   ____________                                                         
                                             Decided: March 23, 2007                                                    
                                                   ____________                                                         
                 Before CHUNG K. PAK, CHARLES F. WARREN, and                                                            
                 CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                       
                 TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                     


                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                         
                        Appellant appeals from the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims                                 
                 11, 13, 14, 16, 18-20, 22-25, 27, and 29-31.  We have jurisdiction under                               
                 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                                                                                      
                        We reverse.  However, we also enter a new ground of rejection.                                  








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013