The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PHILIP J. LINGLE
____________
Appeal 2007-0408
Application 10/150,014
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: March 23, 2007
____________
Before CHUNG K. PAK, CHARLES F. WARREN, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellant appeals from the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims
11, 13, 14, 16, 18-20, 22-25, 27, and 29-31. We have jurisdiction under
35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We reverse. However, we also enter a new ground of rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013