The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MARTIN B. WOLK, JAMES G. BENTSEN, RALPH R. ROBERTS, JOHN S. STARAL, and YINGBO LI ____________ Appeal 2007-0410 Application 10/414,066 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: April 30, 2007 ____________ Before CHARLES F. WARREN, PETER F. KRATZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 4, 5, 13, 17, 18, 24, 25, 28-30, and 35-40. Claims 14-16, 19-23, and 31-34 have been withdrawn from further consideration by the Examiner as drawn to a non-elected species. Claims 26 and 27, the only other claims that remainPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013