Ex Parte Wolk et al - Page 1



                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                           
                            for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     
                                                   ____________                                                         
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                   ____________                                                         
                                           Ex parte MARTIN B. WOLK,                                                     
                                              JAMES G. BENTSEN,                                                         
                                              RALPH R. ROBERTS,                                                         
                                              JOHN S. STARAL, and                                                       
                                                     YINGBO LI                                                          
                                                   ____________                                                         
                                                 Appeal 2007-0410                                                       
                                              Application 10/414,066                                                    
                                              Technology Center 1700                                                    
                                                   ____________                                                         
                                              Decided:  April 30, 2007                                                  
                                                   ____________                                                         
                 Before CHARLES F. WARREN, PETER F. KRATZ, and                                                          
                 JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                        
                 KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                    

                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                         
                        This is an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 4, 5,                        
                 13, 17, 18, 24, 25, 28-30, and 35-40.  Claims 14-16, 19-23, and 31-34 have                             
                 been withdrawn from further consideration by the Examiner as drawn to a                                
                 non-elected species.  Claims 26 and 27, the only other claims that remain                              




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013