The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DOUGLAS K. GENNETTEN and ANDREW C. GORIS ____________ Appeal 2007-0434 Application 10/041,207 Technology Center 2100 ____________ Decided: August 14, 2007 ____________ Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, LANCE LEONARD BARRY, and JAY P. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE A Patent Examiner rejected claims 1 and 3-33. The Appellants appeal therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a). We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013