The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte PAUL K. PIONTKOWSKI __________ Appeal No. 2007-0467 Application No. 10/646,929 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before ADAMS, GRIMES, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges. ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 12, 15, and 22-24. Of the remaining pending claims, claims 18 and 19 have been withdrawn from consideration as drawn to non-elected subject matter and claims 1-11, 14, 16, 17, 20, 21, 25-28, and 30-32 are free from rejection. Claims 12 and 22 illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and are reproduced below: 12. A microscope comprising: a hollow elongated body having opposite ends and enclosing first and second optical paths extending through said hollow elongated body, two oculars mounted at one of said ends, each ocular including a lens assembly, a prism assembly in each optical path adjacent each ocular, a lens magnification changer rotatable mounted about an axis and located intermediate the ends ofPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013