Ex Parte Yamada et al - Page 3



                 Appeal 2007-0476                                                                                      
                 Application 10/726,204                                                                                

                 they cannot be ‘inserted’ into fitting aperture 18” (principal Br. 10, second                         
                 para.).                                                                                               
                        This Remand to the Examiner is made for further consideration of a                             
                 rejection.  Accordingly, 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(a)(2) applies if a supplemental                            
                 examiner’s answer is written in response to this Remand by the Board.                                 
                                                   REMANDED                                                            















                 clj                                                                                                   
                 Baker & Botts LLP                                                                                     
                 30 Rockefeller Plaza                                                                                  
                 44th Floor                                                                                            
                 New York, NY  10112-4498                                                                              


                                                          3                                                            



Page:  Previous  1  2  3

Last modified: September 9, 2013