The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND
TRADEMARKHATCHADOURIANOFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STEVEN AMIGN
AND HOMERO ORTEGON
____________
Appeal 2007-0485
Application 10/457,876
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: May 16, 2007
____________
Before PETER F. KRATZ, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and LINDA M.
GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s
decision rejecting claims 28, 30-34 and 38-51. We have jurisdiction under
35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We AFFIRM.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013