Ex Parte Seseke-Koyro et al - Page 16

                Appeal 2007-0501                                                                             
                Application 10/747,956                                                                       

                      The Examiner should determine whether this disclosure in Seseke-                       
                Koyro ‘641 alone or as combined with other prior art developed by the                        
                Examiner, renders appealed claims 8 through 12 obvious under 35 U.S.C.                       
                § 103(a).  See, e.g., Best, 562 F.2d at 1254-56, 195 USPQ at 433-34; Skoner,                 
                517 F.2d at 950-51, 186 USPQ at 82-83.                                                       
                      No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with                     
                this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2005).                        
                                                AFFIRMED                                                     



                cam                                                                                          

                Crowell & Moring LLP                                                                         
                Intellectual Property Group                                                                  
                P.O. Box 14300                                                                               
                Washington, DC  20044-4300                                                                   














                                                     16                                                      

Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16

Last modified: September 9, 2013