Ex Parte Srinivasan et al - Page 8

                Appeal 2007-0512                                                                             
                Application 10/310,744                                                                       
                      second membrane 14 against the roof deck 16 on both sides of                           
                      the roof membrane fasteners.                                                           
                (Hubbard at col. 7, ll. 29-42 (emphasis added) (items 12, 14, 16, 62, and 64                 
                are illustrated in, e.g., Figure 19, which is not reproduced in this decision.)              
                10. Hubbard also states, with respect to the nozzle 40:                                      
                      [r]eferring to FIGS. 1-9, 10, 13 and 14, the flow of heated air                        
                      from the outlet id [inner diameter] may be from a single                               
                      opening 50 and span across the entire width of the roof                                
                      membrane fastener 18 to form a heat sealing weld on each side                          
                      of the fastener . . . .                                                                
                (Hubbard at col. 6, ll. 32–35; emphasis added.)                                              

                      Henegar                                                                                
                11. Henegar Figures 2 and 3 are reproduced here:                                             



















                                                    -8-                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013