1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered 2 today is not binding precedent of the Board. 3 4 5 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 6 _____________ 7 8 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS 9 AND INTERFERENCES 10 _____________ 11 12 Ex parte JOSEPH J. DOMIJAN 13 _____________ 14 15 Appeal No. 2007-0513 16 Application No. 10/274,797 17 Technology Center 3700 18 ______________ 19 20 Decided: August 15, 2007 21 _______________ 22 22 Before TERRY J. OWENS, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and DAVID B. 23 23 WALKER, Administrative Patent Judges. 24 25 25 OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge. 26 27 28 29 DECISION ON APPEAL 30 31 The Appellant appeals from a rejection of claims 1, 3-8, 10-14 and 17-21, 32 which are all of the pending claims. 33 34 THE INVENTION 35 The Appellant claims an apparatus for double seaming an end unit to a can 36 body. Claim 1 is illustrative:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013