The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ______________ Ex parte SCOTT D. ROGERS ______________ Appeal 2007-0514 Application 10/394,641 Technology Center 1700 ______________ Decided: February 8, 2007 ______________ Before HANLON, TORCZON and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges. SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 4 and 14. Claims 5 through 13, the only other claims pending in the application, have been indicated to be allowable by the Examiner. I. INTRODUCTION Claims 1, 2 and 14 are illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and read as follows (emphasis added).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013