The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JAMES R. BIELOZER
____________
Appeal 2007-0516
Application 10/438,506
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: April 27, 2007
Before RICHARD E. SCHAFER, TEDDY S. GRON, and ROMULO H.
DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.
SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Statement of the Case
1 Applicant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134(b) from a Primary
2 Examiner’s final rejection of Claims 1 and 3-23. Applicant timely filed the
3 appeal on December 27, 2005. We have jurisdiction. 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
4 The Examiner rejected all claims under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 1, as
5 directed to subject matter not supported by the original disclosure. The
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013