The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte MARK J. BEITZ et al. _______________ Appeal 2007-0517 Application 10/768,6471 Technology Center 1700 _______________ Decided: March 28, 2007 Before TORCZON, LANE, and TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges. TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF THE CASE Applicant appeals from a final rejection of claims 1 to 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002). We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002). Applicant’s claimed subject matter generally relates to a process of manufacturing absorbent materials. Typically, personal care absorbent articles are formed from a web or ribbon of fibrous absorbent material that is provided to a machine as a wound roll or coil. To prevent interruption of the processing 1 Application filed January 30, 2004. The real party in interest is Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013