Ex Parte Stawikowski et al - Page 6

               Appeal 2007-0558                                                                             
               Application 09/940,462                                                                       
                      Here, the Provisional '045 describes DaberNet as "[a]n object-oriented                
               software package enabling remote control and remote management of any                        
               network device."  (P. 1, ll. 1-3.)  The Examiner has not explained, however,                 
               whether he considers DaberNet to constitute a WEB service or a WEB                           
               client.  Nor has he shown that the software package interacts with an                        
               automation equipment's program.  Although DaberNet translates XML                            
               messages into SNMP commands, (p. 2), the Examiner has not shown that the                     
               messages are received via an IP network or encoded according to SOAP.                        
               Nor has he shown that DaberNet encodes messages that are to be sent via an                   
               IP network according to SOAP.  Therefore, we reverse the anticipation                        
               rejection of claims 1, 18, and 19 and of claims 2-11, 13-17, and 20, which                   
               depend therefrom.                                                                            
                      The Examiner does not allege, let alone show, that the addition of                    
               Microsoft cures the aforementioned deficiency.  Therefore, we reverse the                    
               obviousness rejection of claim 12.                                                           

                                            V. CONCLUSION                                                   
                      In summary, the rejection of claims 1-11 and 13-20 under § 102(e) is                  
               reversed.  The rejection of claim 12 under § 103(a) is also reversed.                        











                                                     6                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013