Ex Parte Clark et al - Page 12


             Appeal 2007-0561                                                                               
             Application 10/689,465                                                                         
        1    proper for consideration if it is reasonably pertinent to the particular problem with          
        2    which the applicant for patent is involved.  In re Deminski, 796 F.2d at  442, 230             
        3    USPQ at 315.                                                                                   
        4          While the ground plug of Meinhardt is not integral to the bushing, that does             
        5    not detract from or undermine Meinhardt’s teaching that the set screw penetrates               
        6    the trough from a side wall and does not render Meinhardt impertinent.  While the              
        7    grounding wire in Churla is received in a perpendicular orientation relative to the            
        8    axis of the grounding member, that does not detract from or undermine its teaching             
        9    about the orientation of the set screw or about a trough which is integral with the            
       10    grounding clamp.  Neither does the fact that Churla is not concerned with the                  
       11    problem of orienting the grounding clamp with respect to the screws joining the                
       12    separate portions of the clamp together detract from or undermine its teaching                 
       13    about the orientation and positioning of the set screw.  The notion that the presence          
       14    of any different feature or objective in a prior art reference renders the prior art           
       15    reference inapplicable as a teaching source as to another disclosed feature is                 
       16    wrong, defies logic and common sense, and has no basis in law.                                 
       17          The applicants argue that because the clamping member of Meinhardt and                   
       18    Reichman is nonintegral, movable, and also detachable from a monolithic bushing                
       19    and because the clamping member of Mooney is integral and fixed in orientation,                
       20    one with ordinary skill in the art could not combine the teachings of the three                
       21    references.  The argument is without merit.   The teachings have not been used in              
       22    an inconsistent manner as in requiring the clamping member to be both fixed and                
       23    detachable from a bushing, or both fixed and rotatable relative to a bushing, or               
       24    both integral and nonintegral at the same time.  All the teachings of each prior art           
       25    reference are available to one with ordinary skill in the art, as far as they can be put       
       26    together by reliance on logic and common sense.  See, e.g., DyStar Textilfarben                


                                                     12                                                     

Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013