The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today is not binding precedent of the Board.
____________
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MASAHIRO NAKANO,
TSUTOMU AKIYAMA, TADAMASA KITSUKAWA,
and SHIGEHARU KONDO
____________
Appeal 2007-0580
Application 09/839,0001
Technology Center 2600
____________
Decided: September 24, 2007
____________
Before LEE E. BARRETT, JOSEPH L. DIXON, and
MAHSHID D. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Final
Rejection of claims 1 and 3-22. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
§ 6(b).
We affirm-in-part.
1 Application for patent filed April 21, 2001, entitled "System and
Method for Interactive Television."
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013