Appeal 2007-0592
Application 10/263,001
1 CONCLUSION OF LAW
2 (1) Appellant has failed to establish that the Examiner erred in
3 rejecting claims 1-3, 5-12, and 14-16 as being unpatentable under
4 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) over Kurano.
5 (2) Claims 4 and 13 fail to meet the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 103.
6 (3) Claims 1-16 are not patentable.
7
8 DECISION
9 The Examiner's rejection of claims 1-3, 5-12, and 14-16 is affirmed.
10 No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
11 this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
12
13 AFFIRMED
14 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b)
15
16
17
18
19
20 tdl/ce
21
22
23
24
25 MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
26 1111 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NW
27 WASHINGTON DC 20004
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Last modified: September 9, 2013