The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN J. UEBBING
____________
Appeal 2007-0597
Application 10/423,523
Technology Center 2600
____________
Decided: May 2, 2007
____________
Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP,
and ALLEN R. MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a Final Rejection of
claims 1 to 20. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Appellant has invented a camera system and method in which a low-
resolution camera with a plurality of image sensing regions controls the
powering on of a plurality of high resolution cameras. Each of the high-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013