Ex Parte Montgomery et al - Page 1



                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written            
                             for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                     
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               __________                                                   
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               __________                                                   
                      Ex parte RICHARD MONTGOMERY, WILLIAM E. BERRY                                         
                                   and STEPHEN W. MONTGOMERY                                                
                                               __________                                                   
                                            Appeal 2007-0599                                                
                                          Application 10/822,054                                            
                                         Technology Center 2800                                             
                                               __________                                                   
                                                ON BRIEF                                                    
                                               __________                                                   
               Before MILLS, LEBOVITZ, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges.                             
               LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                       
                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      The final rejection of claims 1-20 is on appeal.  We have jurisdiction                
               under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).  We affirm.                                                          

                                         STATEMENT OF CASE                                                  
                      The claims are directed to an apparatus for cooling microprocessor                    
               chips and other electrical components which are used in computers.  “Many                    
               of these components generate heat during normal operation.”  (Specification                  
               at ¶ 2.)  To dissipate the heat, heatsinks and other cooling devices (such as                





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013