The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte RICHARD MONTGOMERY, WILLIAM E. BERRY and STEPHEN W. MONTGOMERY __________ Appeal 2007-0599 Application 10/822,054 Technology Center 2800 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before MILLS, LEBOVITZ, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges. LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL The final rejection of claims 1-20 is on appeal. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm. STATEMENT OF CASE The claims are directed to an apparatus for cooling microprocessor chips and other electrical components which are used in computers. “Many of these components generate heat during normal operation.” (Specification at ¶ 2.) To dissipate the heat, heatsinks and other cooling devices (such asPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013