Appeal 2007-0609 Application 09/814,010 1 The Examiner rejected claims 35 and 36 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) 2 (2004). 3 Claim 35 is representative of the claims under appeal and reads as 4 follows: 5 35. An Internet-enabled appointment and reservation service 6 system, comprising: 7 8 an Internet-connected appointment/reservation server executing 9 first software; and 10 11 one or more subscribing businesses to the service, the 12 businesses each having an internet-connected appliance executing 13 second software; 14 15 wherein the appointment server, through the first software, 16 presents to browsing clients an interactive interface enabling the 17 clients to select individual ones of the subscribing businesses, and 18 once a subscribing business is selected displays to the selecting client 19 an interactive appointment/reservation schedule to select an 20 appointment or reservation with the business, wherein the 21 appointment server updates the appointment/reservation schedule at 22 the server for each business as browsing clients make 23 appointments/reservations, wherein the appointment/reservation 24 server periodically provides updated appointment schedules to the 25 subscribing businesses which are displayed by the second software 26 interactively, allowing the subscribing businesses to further update the 27 appointment reservation schedules and to return them to the 28 appointment/reservation server, which updated versions then becomes 29 the interactive schedules displayed to browsing clients. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013