Appeal 2007-0612 Application 09/838,866 We further remand the application for the Examiner to consider whether “improved vibration damping and stiffness” in the Appellant’s independent claims is indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, due to failure of the claim to indicate with respect to what the vibration damping and stiffness are improved. DECISION The rejection of claims 1-14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Eom in view of Weaver is reversed. The application is remanded to the Examiner. REVERSED and REMANDED jlb COHEN & GRIGSBY, P.C. 11 STANWIX STREET 15TH FLOOR PITTSBURGH PA 15222 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: September 9, 2013