Ex Parte Flatness et al - Page 1



                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                       
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                          
                                             ____________                                                 
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                             ____________                                                 
                                    Ex parte SCOTT A. FLATNESS                                            
                                       and MICHAEL J. AARNIO                                              
                                             ____________                                                 
                                           Appeal 2007-0616                                               
                                         Application 10/733,689                                           
                                        Technology Center 1700                                            
                                             ____________                                                 
                                        Decided: March 28, 2007                                           
                                             ____________                                                 


               Before CHUNG K. PAK, CHARLES F. WARREN and                                                 
               CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           

               PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                     This is an appeal from the Examiner's final rejection of claims 13                   
               through 23.  Claims 1 and 12, the remaining claims pending in the above-                   
               identified application, stand withdrawn from consideration by the Examiner                 
               as being directed to a non-elected invention.  We have jurisdiction pursuant               
               to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.                                                                 





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013