The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SCOTT A. FLATNESS and MICHAEL J. AARNIO ____________ Appeal 2007-0616 Application 10/733,689 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: March 28, 2007 ____________ Before CHUNG K. PAK, CHARLES F. WARREN and CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. PAK, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the Examiner's final rejection of claims 13 through 23. Claims 1 and 12, the remaining claims pending in the above- identified application, stand withdrawn from consideration by the Examiner as being directed to a non-elected invention. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013