Ex Parte Bacher et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                     
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                            

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                                ____________                                                    
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                                ____________                                                    
                         Ex parte ANDREAS BACHER, KARL-ERNST FICKERT,                                           
                                     THEO MAYER and KURT STARK                                                  
                                                ____________                                                    
                                              Appeal 2007-0618                                                  
                                           Application 10/618,936                                               
                                           Technology Center 1700                                               
                                                ____________                                                    
                                         Decided:  February 27, 2007                                            
                                                ____________                                                    

                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and THOMAS A.                                       
                WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                            
                WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                             

                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                       This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s final                        
                rejection of claims 1 through 15, which are the only claims pending in this                     
                application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                 
                       According to Appellants, the invention is directed to silane-containing                  
                polyvinyl alcohols which are hydrolyzed or partially hydrolyzed vinyl ester                     
                copolymers having a degree of hydrolysis of 75-100 mol%, where these                            




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013