The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte CHINMEI CHEN LEE and DOUGLAS WILLIAM VARNEY
__________
Appeal 2007-0638
Application 09/933,655
Technology Center 2600
__________
Decided: May 16, 2007
__________
Before DONALD E. ADAMS, TONI R. SCHEINER, and
ERIC GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.
GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to a wireless
communication system and a method of controlling surveillance. The
Examiner has rejected the claims as anticipated or obvious. We have
jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
The Specification describes “a method of initiating surveillance” in
which “a mobile terminal subscriber can seize control of and direct
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013