Ex Parte Lee et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        



                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                           
                                              ___________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ___________                                                  
                                Ex parte Hea-Jeung Lee and Gye-Baeg Lee                                    
                                              ___________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2007-0642                                               
                                         Application 10/267,877                                            
                                         Technology Center 2600                                            
                                              ___________                                                  
                                         Decided: May 23, 2007                                             
                                              ___________                                                  

                   Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH L. DIXON, and                                            
                   JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
                   DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                     


                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                   This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b) and 134 from the                   
               Examiner's Final Rejection of claims 1-8 and 10-16.                                         

               We AFFIRM.                                                                                  




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013