Appeal 2007-0643
Application 10/015,825
managed file system where a previous scanning is left off, and continued
accordingly. We disagree. Cabrera describes storing information in a
journal file 94 (Fig. 4) to allow a hierarchical storage manager to resume
operations at the point of any interruption. Col. 13, l. 62 - col. 14, l. 4.
We have considered Appellants’ arguments in support of
representative claims 1, 3, and 4. As we are not persuaded that any claim
has been rejected in error, we sustain the § 102(e) rejection of claims 1 and
3-20.
CONCLUSION
The rejection of claims 1 and 3-20 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being
anticipated by Cabrera is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
rwk
KUNZLER & ASSOCIATES
8 EAST BROADWAY
SUITE 600
SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Last modified: September 9, 2013