Ex Parte Urbanus - Page 2


                 Appeal No. 2007-0671                                                       Page 2                   
                 Application No.  10/836,174                                                                         


                        2. A disposable medication dispenser as set forth in claim 1 wherein said                    
                           disposable medication dispenser is an inhaler and wherein said                            
                           housing permanently attached to said canister defines a mouthpiece                        
                           through which said medication is dispensed, and wherein said                              
                           electronic circuit includes a numerical display positioned on the exterior                
                           of said housing above said mouthpiece for direct viewing by a user of                     
                           said dispenser when said mouthpiece is brought to the user’s mouth.                       
                        5. A disposable medication dispenser as set forth in claim 1 wherein said                    
                           electronic circuit includes one or more count presetting switches for                     
                           presetting a count in said electronic circuit at the time said housing and                
                           said canister are combined during initial assembly.                                       

                        The references relied upon by the examiner are:                                              
                 Mishelevich et al. (Mishelevich)  5,363,842  Nov. 15, 1994                                          
                 Wolf      5,809,997  Sep. 22, 1998                                                                  
                 Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary (Dictionary), p. 865 (10th ed., Merriam-                    
                 Webster, Inc. 1998)1                                                                                

                                           GROUNDS OF REJECTION                                                      
                        Claims 1, 2, 6, 10, 11, and 13-16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)                    
                 as anticipated by Wolf.                                                                             
                        Claims 2-4, 7-9, and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                        
                 unpatentable over the combination of Wolf and Mishelevich.                                          
                        We reverse the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).  We vacate the                            
                 rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 and remand the application to the examiner for                      
                 further consideration.                                                                              


                                                                                                                     
                 1 We were unable to locate this reference in the electronic file.  Nevertheless, we were able to    
                 locate a copy of the reference outside of the record.  Accordingly, we have attached a copy of the  
                 reference to this opinion.                                                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013