1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today 2 was not written for publication and 3 is not binding precedent of the Board. 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 8 _____________ 9 10 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS 11 AND INTERFERENCES 12 _____________ 13 14 Ex parte RONALD P. SANSONE, 15 ROBERT A. CORDERY, and DONALD G. MACKAY 16 _____________ 17 18 Appeal No. 2007-0678 19 Application No. 09/818,792 20 Technology Center 3600 21 ______________ 22 23 Decided: March 27, 2007 24 _______________ 25 26 Before TERRY J. OWENS, ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, and 27 ROBERT E. NAPPI Administrative Patent Judges. 28 29 NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge. 30 31 32 DECISION ON APPEAL 33 34 This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the final 35 rejection of claims 1 through 35. For the reasons stated infra we will not 36 sustain the Examiner’s rejection of these claims. 37Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013