Appeal 2007-0681
Application 09/805,978
a second transmitting unit for transmitting the image specifying
data and the orderer specifying data, which has been received by said first
receiving unit, to one of said plurality of second client computers that has
been determined by said determination unit in association with each other;
and
said one of said plurality of second client computers comprising:
a second receiving unit for receiving the image specifying
data and the orderer specifying data transmitted from said second
transmitting unit of said center server; and
a first alerting unit for giving notice of information regarding
an image specified by the image specifying data and of an orderer
represented by the orderer specifying data, which items of data have been
received by said second receiving unit.
The prior art references of record relied upon by the Examiner in
rejecting the appealed claims are:
Freedman US 4,839,829 June 13, 1989
Hartman US 5,960,411 Sep. 28, 1999
Greulich US 6,018,338 Jan. 25, 2000
Claims 1 through 7, 11 through 14, 16, 17, and 19 through 33 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Freedman in view
of Hartman.
Claims 8 through 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Freedman in view of Hartman and Greulich.
We refer to the Examiner's Answer (mailed March 3, 2006) and to
Appellant's Brief (filed November 23, 2005) for the respective arguments.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013