Ex Parte Pottebaum et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                  Ex parte KENNETH L. POTTEBAUM,                                             
                       SVETLANA I. KOVINSKAYA, and JOHN D. STRICKLIN                                         
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-0683                                                
                                          Application 10/121,772                                             
                                          Technology Center 2800                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                           Decided: June 6, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                  

                Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, and ALLEN R.                                     
                MACDONALD,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                                    
                RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                       


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                                      STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                  
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Final Rejection of                    
                claims 1-8 and 11-22.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).  An oral                 
                telephonic hearing was conducted on this appeal on May 23, 2007.                             
                      We affirm.                                                                             




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013