Ex Parte Cochran - Page 1



                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                      
                      written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                     

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                            ________________                                                 
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                            ________________                                                 
                                   Ex parte DUSTIN ALAN COCHRAN                                              
                                            ________________                                                 
                                             Appeal 2007-0685                                                
                                          Application 10/242,336                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                            ________________                                                 
                                         Decided:  March 28, 2007                                            
                                            ________________                                                 
                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and                                              
                CHARLES F. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
                KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 9-24.  Claim 9 is                 
                illustrative:                                                                                
                      9.  An apparatus for forming grooves within a journal bearing,                         
                comprising:                                                                                  
                      an electrode having a main body and an extension extending at an end                   
                of the main body, the extension having an outside diameter sized to fit                      
                within an inside diameter of the journal bearing to form a fluid gap                         
                                                                                                            



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013