The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte PHIL-INSUL CORPORATION
_______________
Appeal 2007-0694
Reexamination Control 90/006,433
Patent 5,428,933
Technology Center 3600
_______________
Decided: 26 June 2007
Before RICHARD E. SCHAFER, SALLY C. MEDLEY, and
MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. §§ 134 and 306
(2006) from the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1-30, which represent
all of the pending claims.
We affirm-in-part and enter a new grounds of rejection.
I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
A request for reexamination was filed on October 31, 2002 by patent
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013