Ex Parte BROWNING et al - Page 3



                Appeal 2007-0700                                                                              
                Application 09/159,509                                                                        
                Patent 5,559,995                                                                              

                      4.     Independent claims 10 and 84 under appeal reads as follows:                      
                                   10.   A method for creating a data base representing a                     
                             virtual world, the method comprising:                                            
                                   receiving a plurality of polygon representations of virtual                
                             objects;                                                                         
                                   selecting first and second virtual objects from said                       
                             plurality of polygon representations of virtual objects;                         
                                   grouping the first and second virtual objects into a three-                
                             dimensional grouped object;                                                      
                                   assigning a grouping hierarchy for the first and second                    
                             virtual objects, wherein the second virtual object is assigned as                
                             the child of the first virtual object; and                                       
                                   calculating an orientation and position of the child object                
                             relative to the first virtual object.                                            


                                                                                                              
                rejection was not in compliance with the rules in effect at the time the                      
                Examiner's Answer was mailed in March of 2002.  Additionally, there is                        
                some possibility on this record that Appellants might have argued that the                    
                Supplemental Examiner’s Answer, mailed July 7, 2006, which restructures                       
                the statement of the rejection, is in effect a second “new ground of rejection”               
                and was not in compliance with the rules in effect at the time it was mailed                  
                in July of 2006.  See 37 CFR § 41.43(a)(2) (2006), which became effective                     
                on September 13, 2004.  In the Reply Briefs, filed June 6, 2002 and                           
                September 7, 2006, Appellants did not make any of these arguments or note                     
                any procedural objection to the manner in which the Examiner procedurally                     
                presented the Examiner’s position on appeal.  Accordingly, Appellants have                    
                waived any procedural error which might have occurred in the manner in                        
                which the Examiner handled the appeal.                                                        

                                                    - 3 -                                                     

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013