Ex Parte Burch et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          


                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                                __________                                                    
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                __________                                                    
                          Ex parte STEVEN D. BURCH and JOHN C. FAGLEY                                         
                                                __________                                                    
                                             Appeal 2007-0704                                                 
                                           Application 10/623,674                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                              
                                                ___________                                                   
                                     REMAND TO THE EXAMINER                                                   
                                                ___________                                                   

                   This application was electronically received at the Board of Patent Appeals                
            and Interferences on December 14, 2006.  Upon review of the application, it has                   
            been determined that a remand to the Examiner, via the Office of the Director of                  
            the Technology Center, is necessary to consider the following issue and to take                   
            necessary corrective action.                                                                      
                   The Examiner has failed to list all prior art relied upon in the rejections                
            currently on appeal under the heading “(8) Evidence Relied Upon” in the                           
            Examiner’s Answer mailed September 7, 2005.  References to Grasso et al. (US                      
            2001/0004500), Bloomfield (3,982,962), Beshty et al. (4,670,359), Towler et al.                   
            (6,375,924), Clawson et al. (US 2002/0004152 A1), Buswell et al. (5,360,679),                     
            Okada et al. (5,302,470), Van Dine et al. (6,331,366), Hallum et al. (US                          




Page:  1  2  3  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013