The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte STEVEN D. BURCH and JOHN C. FAGLEY __________ Appeal 2007-0704 Application 10/623,674 Technology Center 1700 ___________ REMAND TO THE EXAMINER ___________ This application was electronically received at the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences on December 14, 2006. Upon review of the application, it has been determined that a remand to the Examiner, via the Office of the Director of the Technology Center, is necessary to consider the following issue and to take necessary corrective action. The Examiner has failed to list all prior art relied upon in the rejections currently on appeal under the heading “(8) Evidence Relied Upon” in the Examiner’s Answer mailed September 7, 2005. References to Grasso et al. (US 2001/0004500), Bloomfield (3,982,962), Beshty et al. (4,670,359), Towler et al. (6,375,924), Clawson et al. (US 2002/0004152 A1), Buswell et al. (5,360,679), Okada et al. (5,302,470), Van Dine et al. (6,331,366), Hallum et al. (USPage: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013