Appeal 2007-0705
Application 10/431,127
Appellants’ countervailing evidence of and argument for nonobviousness
and conclude that the claimed invention encompassed by appealed claims
1 through 20 would have been obvious as a matter of law under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a).
The Primary Examiner’s decision is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006).
AFFIRMED
cam
Sunbeam Products, Inc.
2381 Executive Center Drive
Boca Raton, FL 33431
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: September 9, 2013