The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CHRISTOPHER PETER OLSON,
KATHLEEN IRENE RATLIFF, and SHIRLEE ANN WEBER
____________
Appeal 2007-0714
Application 10/651,3541
Technology Center 3700
____________
Decided: August 27, 2007
____________
Before DEMETRA J. MILLS, ERIC GRIMES, and LORA M. GREEN,
Administrative Patent Judges.
GREEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 6-12, 17, 18, 20, 26, 27, and 29-35.
We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). Claim 1 is representative of
the claims on appeal, and reads as follows:
1 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide Inc. is the real party in interest (Br. 1).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013