The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KENJI OSE
____________
Appeal 2007-0722
Application 09/992,597
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: February 28, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and THOMAS A.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
REMAND UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(a)(1) AND
ORDER UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(d)
This appeal involves claims 34-37, 40, 41, 43-47, 49-55, 61-65, 73,
and 74. The claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) and 35 U.S.C.
103(a).
The appealed claims are directed to a bicycle shift control device.
The device comprises, inter alia, a rotatable dial coupled to a base member
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013