Ex Parte Butt et al - Page 1



                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is                           
                                     not binding precedent of the Board.                                        

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                ____________                                                    
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                                ____________                                                    
                  Ex parte ALAN B. BUTT, DAVID A. EATOUGH, and TONY SARRA                                       
                                                ____________                                                    
                                              Appeal 2007-0727                                                  
                                            Application 09/951,711                                              
                                           Technology Center 2100                                               
                                                ____________                                                    
                                            Decided: July 11, 2007                                              
                                                ____________                                                    

                Before JAMES D. THOMAS, KENNETH W. HAIRSTON,                                                    
                and HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
                THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            


                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    


                       This appeal involves claims 1, 3-9, 11-17, 19-25, and 27-32.  We have                    
                jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b) and 134(a).                                                
                       As best representative of the disclosed and claimed invention,                           
                independent claim 1 is reproduced below:                                                        





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013