The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte VIJAY KUMAR and YANG DONG __________ Appeal No. 2007-0744 Application No. 10/007,866 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before ADAMS, MILLS, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges. MILLS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's final rejection of claims 36. Claim 36 is the only pending claim and appears in the attached appendix to the Brief. Grounds of Rejection Claim 36 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph for failing to comply with the written description requirement. We affirm the written description rejection.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013