Ex Parte Kumar et al - Page 1

                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                            for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          
                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                           
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                  Ex parte  VIJAY KUMAR and YANG DONG                                           
                                             Appeal No. 2007-0744                                               
                                          Application No. 10/007,866                                            
                                                  ON BRIEF                                                      
             Before ADAMS, MILLS, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.                                     
             MILLS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                

                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                   This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the Examiner's final                 
             rejection of claims 36.                                                                            
                   Claim 36 is the only pending claim and appears in the attached appendix to the               

             Grounds of Rejection                                                                               
                   Claim 36 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C.  112, first paragraph for failing to               
             comply with the written description requirement.                                                   
                   We affirm the written description rejection.                                                 

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013